Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More  

Go Back   Speedo Fantasy Board - Mens Swim Suit Board - Briefs, Bikinis, and More > Mens Swim Suit Forums > General Mens Swim Suit Guy Talk
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-2015, 08:10 PM
Lap Counter Lap Counter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 246
Default Montana legislator wants to ban Speedos

David Moore, a Republican legislator, has introduced HB365 in the Montana legislature. If passed, it would ban yoga pants, Speedos, and other tight clothing. Call the Fashion Police!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2015, 10:06 PM
Dooley67 Dooley67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 530
Thumbs down

Apparently the legislature in Montana has nothing more important to debate.

D67
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2015, 01:46 AM
California Dolphin California Dolphin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 386
Default

What is the purported reason for the ban?

It never ceases to amaze me that republican prudes are always the ones who get picked up for having gay sex "On The Down Low".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2015, 03:23 AM
Jerry Jerry is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 24
Default

Not gay.......just cross dressers 😝
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2015, 04:37 AM
NE_OH_thonger NE_OH_thonger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 239
Default

Out of curiosity, I looked on the website of the Montana legislature. This bill is listed as "Tabled in Committee." This usually means that the bill has been set aside, and is unlikely to be reconsidered.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-2015, 06:22 AM
NJHunkguy NJHunkguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 459
Default

According to The Montana Standard, the proposed bill would:

“…include any nipple exposure, including men’s, and any garment that “gives the appearance or simulates” a person’s buttocks, genitals, pelvic area or female nipple.”
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-12-2015, 02:21 PM
50 Free 50 Free is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 114
Default

He got laughed at and is being ridiculed worldwide now.
This isn't a partisan thing, nor from lack of anything better to do. It's what happens when an out of shape, teenie-peepee, bible thumping idiot somehow comes to power. Mostly jealousy. Think about it, and always vote carefully.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:02 AM
SwimTeamSpeedo SwimTeamSpeedo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Maine USA
Posts: 1,148
Default Where is the line

There is a big part of this legislation that I don't get. Put aside swimsuits and yoga pants. Where does one draw the line? Are jeans that show off a bulge off limits? What about guys who are well endowed and show a bulge in dress pants when not even erect? Who decides what is stimulating? A pretty, tall girl in a red dress can do that to some guy...is her attire stimulating. I love Montana, it is a great state with a wonderful wilderness (much like my home state of Maine). But, this is backwoods stupid, even if you put aside the controversial guys in swimsuits or ladies in yoga pants.

STS
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2015, 12:31 AM
Dooley67 Dooley67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 530
Thumbs up

There was a piece on the NBC Nightly News tonight which really lambasted the guy who introduced the legislation which was summarily voted in committee to be tabled, meaning that it would not be brought up for discussion. I can't imagine why it was tabled...lol.

D67
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2015, 04:36 AM
PSDave PSDave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 657
Default

Sounds like he is afraid of genitals. Doesn't want to see male bulges or female camel toes. He must be a barrel of fun in the bedroom.
Not knowing the wording of the bill I would have to agree with the yoga pants in public. Just saw a woman at Walmart (that place seems to attract weird) who's yoga pants were so tight you could see the hair on her pussy. Considering she was about 5' tall and weighed 250 pounds -- that no yoga law would have saved a lot of people from a very ugly sight!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All message content is the sole responsibility of the individual message poster.