|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gross looking bulge
I never thought I would say this about a bulge, however this bulge looks like some form of testicular tumor growth!
I hope I am soo wrong about this. Never wish that on such a beautiful boy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
another photoshop?
Not sure of the wisdom of this post, referring to a beautiful boy and a disease
(tumor and growth is tautology) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There is not shape or form of any sort to it. I like seeing the separation of the sack and the shaft.
It could be the angle of the picture as it was taken, distorting the package Definetely not arguing the beauty of the boy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
off topic
Your interest in the lower male anatomy brings me to another question - so are there any medical students out there?
The scrotum will appear tight and compact and also sagging (the latter being rather ugly I always think). Is there any reason for this difference - or is it just that every male body is not 100% identical, as in penis size? One fascinating feature I have noticed on a tight ball-sack is a perfectly central ridge of skin, as if two halves been sewn together. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
gross looking bulge
Theres a ic of Alexander Despatie in a red suit with a similar bulge.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Camera angles
The photo is taken from the side (slightly forward), it is perhaps not the best angle to see a tightly packed package in a small wet suit. Be kind, get a front view of the same swimmer before making a judgement.
Camera angles often distort and confuse an image, big telephoto lenses appear to flatten perspective in distant objects. The out of focus background and "cardboard cut-out" image of the swimmer suggests that a powerful telephoto lens is being used. Last edited by Torchwatch : 10-25-2013 at 06:40 PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|