![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I never thought I would say this about a bulge, however this bulge looks like some form of testicular tumor growth!
I hope I am soo wrong about this. Never wish that on such a beautiful boy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not sure of the wisdom of this post, referring to a beautiful boy and a disease
(tumor and growth is tautology) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There is not shape or form of any sort to it. I like seeing the separation of the sack and the shaft.
It could be the angle of the picture as it was taken, distorting the package ![]() Definetely not arguing the beauty of the boy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Your interest in the lower male anatomy brings me to another question - so are there any medical students out there?
The scrotum will appear tight and compact and also sagging (the latter being rather ugly I always think). Is there any reason for this difference - or is it just that every male body is not 100% identical, as in penis size? One fascinating feature I have noticed on a tight ball-sack is a perfectly central ridge of skin, as if two halves been sewn together. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Theres a ic of Alexander Despatie in a red suit with a similar bulge.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The photo is taken from the side (slightly forward), it is perhaps not the best angle to see a tightly packed package in a small wet suit. Be kind, get a front view of the same swimmer before making a judgement.
Camera angles often distort and confuse an image, big telephoto lenses appear to flatten perspective in distant objects. The out of focus background and "cardboard cut-out" image of the swimmer suggests that a powerful telephoto lens is being used. Last edited by Torchwatch : 10-25-2013 at 05:40 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|